Skip to main content


F. W. J. Schelling says:
He who wishes to place himself in the beginning of a truly free philosophy must abandon even God. Here we say: who wishes to maintain it, he will lose it; and who gives it up, he will find it. Only he has come to the ground of himself and has known the whole depth of life who has once abandoned everything and has himself been abandoned by everything. He for whom everything disappeared and who saw himself with the infinite: a great step which Plato compared to death.

Abandonment takes away--but it also gives. And it does not simply give back what was once there--on the contrary. It gives something totally other, something totally new.

Because to get back what was lost will only mean losing it again: it will and has to necessarily slip away again because it never did belong in your hands. To lose something once means to be able to lose it over and over again. This is not a fault of man's part or a lack in man's hands: this is the very law of objects, or which comes to the same, the very essence of things we think we can comprehend, handle or control. Such things will always necessarily escape our hands.

This is abandonment: losing what you hitherto thought you had multiplied by infinity. Because abandonment needs to be total: it has to be complete, unconditioned, and with neither remorse nor hope. Totality belongs to abandonment's essence. If abandonment were merely a "slap on the wrist" or losing another game of chess, then abandonment would be abandoned by its meaning. But the word is very clear as to what it says: to "a-band-on" or to decisively break the band which hitherto banded two distinct and separate things in a jointure and relationship. Or as the French noun abandon indicates, the word means to "let something loose" in the sense of "giving it up absolutely." To "let loose" and to "give up": these words taken negatively mean losing and giving up something (everything) and to thus be left with nothing absolutely and without remainder. But positively taken, they mean the opposite in that by "letting lose," something is set free; and in giving up, something is offered as a gift to an other.

But these are merely word games. He who has been abandoned knows in his bones that nothing cuts the flesh more decisively and nothing breaks the heart more violently than total abandonment. It cuts: because there is no better way of separation than by one swift and clean cut. It breaks: because there is no better way of destruction than by wrecking everything to the ground. But why must I be cut?--why must I be destroyed? There can be no answer: abandonment must be completed lest it not be itself--and for it to be total abandonment, it must necessarily also take away all answers, reasons and--finally--it must take with it all hope.

For what kind of abandonment is a hopeful abandonment? Abandonment never returns. It pays you a visit only once. Like a storm. Like a total eclipse. Or like death.

But abandonment must be thought more fundamentally than hopelessness or despair--to do so would be shooting the messenger first without hearing the good news. But what kind of hidden message may abandonment bring? What sort of good news can there be in such a total destruction? If abandonment cuts and breaks you and leaves you with a pain with no name, how to think it?

Perhaps it is the very reception of abandonment, our attunement to it which tells us something about abandonment's arrival. The message is hidden in the pain we suffer. To be sure, pain can either tell us nothing but it can also tell us everything. Nothing: because pain is that very absence--the suffering of the presence of that nameless absence. Everything: that I am only able to experience pain because I am weak, because I am not as strong as I thought, in a word, because, I, too, like pain, am nothing.

To experience being nothing: this is what pain is. The cut in my flesh is the very opening which accommodates the space for nothing. My broken heart is love's collapse which clears the ground of the weight it had hitherto carried (look: it is now the desert it used to be). Pain is the inverted joy of presence--its fullness, its lightness, and all its hopes. But pain is no mere reversal or negation as if it were merely a happiness postponed or a waiting upon love's arrival or return. We already know this: that pain is real, sometimes more real than real joy. Because the absence that pain heralds is a reality like no other: an empty cup which we ask to be passed over us, a heavy cross which we ask an other to help us carry, and the nail which cuts open the hands and suspends the body on a wooden cross caught between heaven and hell. And I do not recall Christ laughing in joy.

Pain, as the real suffering of absence like no other: this is what we go through when we are abandoned. And there are only two things you can do when abandonment and the pain it carries arrive: you can either ask that it be passed from you and thereby disqualify the pain as your pain, or you can absorb it, bear it, carry it--perhaps even love it. Abandonment takes away all presence--but it also gives absence. And you can absorb, bear, carry and even love that very absence: we eventually learn how to love the night. After all, what is there to love when everything has abandoned you?

"Eloi, eloi sabachtani." You see, Christ, too, was totally abandoned by his father. Was totally abandoned in death.

Complete abandonment: death for most, but a new life for the few who survive it. And for those few who resurrect from abandonment's destruction, they feel an unsurpassed joy in their broken hearts--a joy that can only come with knowing that it is now possible to finally begin.



Popular posts from this blog

The Fields of Amorsolo

The first National Artist in Philippine history, referred to warmly as the “Grand Old Man of Philippine Art,” Fernando Amorsolo (1892–1972) still stands today as a looming figure in Philippine art responsible for being one of the artists who helped define what we up to now visually imagine as essentially Filipino. The images of rural life, of golden fields below clear blue, blue skies; the smiles of farmers which diminish their weariness as they plant, harvest, and winnow rice;most especially the iconic figure of the Filipina maiden working in the fields—the beloved dalagang bukid--; these, I believe, even after generations of Filipino painters since Amorsolo, have remained in our hearts and memory. Amorsolo did what great masters do for their country: bestow upon it its own icons, represent its native beauty, that is, to give its people and lands an identity and a face. There are, however, as many intentions for art as there are works of art. And these intentions will always remain in…

Without Why (The Rose) II

Lifetime is a child at play; moving pieces in a game.
Kingship belongs to the child.

Heraclitus, Fragment 52

The child at play never asks itself why it plays. The child just plays; and if it could, it will play as long as possible, it will play throughout its life. See its delight and witness its smile.

If it would never go hungry or if the sun would never set it too will never leave its playmates and playthings. Time flies at play because it stops or suspends time. Time -- as we grownups only know too well -- is the culprit for order, schedules and priorities; yet for the child, there is no time, there is only bottomless play. It is we who impose that this or that should be done at this or that time. We stop the absurd and supposedly endless play ("He does nothing but play") because we insist that discipline, order and priorities be instilled in the child at an early age ("He needs to learn other things beside playing"). So that the child will become like us one da…

A Love Sooner than Later

BROWN PENNY William Butler YeatsI whispered, 'I am too young,' And then, 'I am old enough'; Wherefore I threw a penny To find out if I might love. 'Go and love, go and love, young man, If the lady be young and fair.' Ah, penny, brown penny, brown penny, I am looped in the loops of her hair. O love is the crooked thing, There is nobody wise enough To find out all that is in it, For he would be thinking of love Till the stars had run away And the shadows eaten the moon. Ah, penny, brown penny, brown penny, One cannot begin it too soon.

One cannot begin to love too soon--conversely, one should not love too late or in life's demise. That waiting for the "right time," or the "right person" to love, what are these but the cries or sighs of an unready, even tired, heart? One becomes ready only when one begins to understand love slowly (or again), and one understands love progressively when one, simply, performs the act of love. Love, like mos…