Skip to main content

Love's Punishment

I told my students that only those who take the chance to love--those who gamble and raise the stakes, those who pose love's question and expose themselves to an answer that comes from elsewhere--I paradoxically told them that it is only the lover or the one who affords to lose everything that can never lose. So they asked me to clarify.

I said that the beloved, who by definition is only loved and need not love, does not seem to stand to lose anything in front of love's advance. Again, how could she?--when she only receives (or rejects), answers (yes or no) or ignores the love-question.

But on the other end of love's gift, the giver, who by definition only knows how to give, in this case, give love, seems to be the "party" that is most susceptible and vulnerable (like the open hand which can be slapped, the wide embrace that reveals and uncovers the heart, the admission that is necessarily followed by a judgment).

In our everyday experiences, it is the one who loved and is not loved in return who suffers the "heartbreak." We do not see those who reject love staring into space midday or hiding their tears or lending their sorrows to the cool hand of night.

Verily, this is love's punishment: that he who dared to love, through the virtue of his own courage, will equally have to wager between a glorious victory or a terrible upset. Of course these words of war and games neither really apply to love nor the lover; but the point is clear: only the daring can be victorious--and only they could fall.

But--and this was my point: while it may at first seem that the broken lover is the one who "lost everything," and while the beloved, in contrast, in her petrified immobility, seems to have neither gained nor lost anything; that is, while the one who loved more will suffer more (always in balance) at the beginning of love's end than she who did not love as much or love at all; or finally, while it is the giver who suffers the lost gift when she did not receive it--such immediate loss, suffering, and brokenness are but momentary, I say.

It only takes some time for the lover to see that he could not have done otherwise--could not but love, as he is, by definition, him who could only love: and there is dignity in this.

The lover, who seems to lose everything in love, ends up not losing anything precisely because he did not contradict his essence in denying himself a possible love. What is more, the lover fulfilled his identity of being a lover and no other.

As courage and daring never stop short in front of the possibility of loss for they are what they are because they can stand to lose themselves, the lover still prevails--no longer as a glorious victor but as the valiant failure--because the lover becomes what he is.

As for the beloved? In her rejection of love's gift, a gift she did not need and can do without, she at first does not seem to lose anything. But this is an illusion which hides the sadness of her loss. Yet what loss?--when she did not give or gain!

Only the highest loss worthy of her name: in rejecting the lover the beloved is disqualified as beloved, hence dispossessing her of her essence, and finally sentencing her to a silence where only the echoes of the lover's retreat can be heard.


Popular posts from this blog

The Fields of Amorsolo

The first National Artist in Philippine history, referred to warmly as the “Grand Old Man of Philippine Art,” Fernando Amorsolo (1892–1972) still stands today as a looming figure in Philippine art responsible for being one of the artists who helped define what we up to now visually imagine as essentially Filipino. The images of rural life, of golden fields below clear blue, blue skies; the smiles of farmers which diminish their weariness as they plant, harvest, and winnow rice;most especially the iconic figure of the Filipina maiden working in the fields—the beloved dalagang bukid--; these, I believe, even after generations of Filipino painters since Amorsolo, have remained in our hearts and memory. Amorsolo did what great masters do for their country: bestow upon it its own icons, represent its native beauty, that is, to give its people and lands an identity and a face. There are, however, as many intentions for art as there are works of art. And these intentions will always remain in…

Without Why (The Rose) II

Lifetime is a child at play; moving pieces in a game.
Kingship belongs to the child.

Heraclitus, Fragment 52

The child at play never asks itself why it plays. The child just plays; and if it could, it will play as long as possible, it will play throughout its life. See its delight and witness its smile.

If it would never go hungry or if the sun would never set it too will never leave its playmates and playthings. Time flies at play because it stops or suspends time. Time -- as we grownups only know too well -- is the culprit for order, schedules and priorities; yet for the child, there is no time, there is only bottomless play. It is we who impose that this or that should be done at this or that time. We stop the absurd and supposedly endless play ("He does nothing but play") because we insist that discipline, order and priorities be instilled in the child at an early age ("He needs to learn other things beside playing"). So that the child will become like us one da…

A Love Sooner than Later

BROWN PENNY William Butler YeatsI whispered, 'I am too young,' And then, 'I am old enough'; Wherefore I threw a penny To find out if I might love. 'Go and love, go and love, young man, If the lady be young and fair.' Ah, penny, brown penny, brown penny, I am looped in the loops of her hair. O love is the crooked thing, There is nobody wise enough To find out all that is in it, For he would be thinking of love Till the stars had run away And the shadows eaten the moon. Ah, penny, brown penny, brown penny, One cannot begin it too soon.

One cannot begin to love too soon--conversely, one should not love too late or in life's demise. That waiting for the "right time," or the "right person" to love, what are these but the cries or sighs of an unready, even tired, heart? One becomes ready only when one begins to understand love slowly (or again), and one understands love progressively when one, simply, performs the act of love. Love, like mos…