Skip to main content

Those who leave

When someone who you were supposed to be with together in an endeavor, for example, your classmate, suddenly calls it quits, says "it was no longer worth the trouble," and then drops out, one could not but feel a sense of betrayal. Aside from the sadness that his absence may bring (yesterday he was just here beside me); beyond the uncertainty of seeing him again; and, worst of all, more than the puzzle which he leaves on his trail (why did he go? what were his reasons?)--what his departure ultimately means for you is the realization that it is possible to quit and leave, that you too can go.

We get caught up in the details of everyday life usually forgetting why things are done and why they are done in such and such a way. The student forgets what education is for: he only knows that everyone is studying, that it would make him different from his friends if he did not (work already, study at home, etc.); and that the only truth you hear about it is that they say you will get a better job (which translates to better pay) if you finish your education and finish it well. Then lo and behold, see how the graduate finds out that in his first few jobs, because he did not pay attention to the essentials of education in favor of memorization and specialization, he has to learn, always the hard way, the basics which he failed to practice: discipline and diligence, humility and integrity.

And so when you do not know what your being a student is for, when you're only pantomiming what true students are, mimicking them at the same time mocking their seriousness, it becomes rather easy to leave it all behind: all you need is a failing mark for a test you studied for all week or a depression which would not go away and you already have all the reasons to leave because you had none to stay. It is the same with the lover who departs and the suicide.


Popular posts from this blog

The Fields of Amorsolo

The first National Artist in Philippine history, referred to warmly as the “Grand Old Man of Philippine Art,” Fernando Amorsolo (1892–1972) still stands today as a looming figure in Philippine art responsible for being one of the artists who helped define what we up to now visually imagine as essentially Filipino. The images of rural life, of golden fields below clear blue, blue skies; the smiles of farmers which diminish their weariness as they plant, harvest, and winnow rice;most especially the iconic figure of the Filipina maiden working in the fields—the beloved dalagang bukid--; these, I believe, even after generations of Filipino painters since Amorsolo, have remained in our hearts and memory. Amorsolo did what great masters do for their country: bestow upon it its own icons, represent its native beauty, that is, to give its people and lands an identity and a face. There are, however, as many intentions for art as there are works of art. And these intentions will always remain in…

[Payapang Daigdig]

Written by Pat Nogoy, S.J.

Payapang Daigdig Felipe de Leon, Sr. 
Ang gabi'y payapa Lahat ay tahimik  Pati mga tala      Sa bughaw na langit 

Kay hinhin ng hangin Waring umiibig          Sa kapayapaan          Ng buong daigdig     
Payapang panahon    Ay diwa ng buhay Biyaya ng Diyos       Sa sangkatauhan
Ang gabi'y payapa Lahat ay tahimik Pati mga tala Sa bughaw na langit  
Pati mga tala           Sa bughaw na langit

The gift delivers Being/being Jean Luc Marion

There is something about the night.
The blanket of darkness hovering the other half of the day sparks ambivalence. Everything is the same in darkness—fear, joy, pain, triumph, doubt, glory, sorrow. Identities recede unto the vast anonymity. There is a pervading anxiety where existence slips into nothingness. One is never certain what to make out of darkness; maybe that is why the night shakes us because we never know. One cannot avoid imagining a something that is greater, higher, mightier, (even sinister) that lurks (hence the power of ghos…

Without Why (The Rose) II

Lifetime is a child at play; moving pieces in a game.
Kingship belongs to the child.

Heraclitus, Fragment 52

The child at play never asks itself why it plays. The child just plays; and if it could, it will play as long as possible, it will play throughout its life. See its delight and witness its smile.

If it would never go hungry or if the sun would never set it too will never leave its playmates and playthings. Time flies at play because it stops or suspends time. Time -- as we grownups only know too well -- is the culprit for order, schedules and priorities; yet for the child, there is no time, there is only bottomless play. It is we who impose that this or that should be done at this or that time. We stop the absurd and supposedly endless play ("He does nothing but play") because we insist that discipline, order and priorities be instilled in the child at an early age ("He needs to learn other things beside playing"). So that the child will become like us one da…