Skip to main content

You Might Just Get It

Why is getting what you wish for sometimes more problematic than getting what you did not ask? I've a theory. Perhaps because the responsibility for your decisions falls squarely on your shoulders, and you shall have nobody else to blame but yourself. I have coined some words for such situations: "Ginusto mo iyan eh. Malaya ka naman."

There is freedom in not being free to choose. Most wail and whine and complain when their freedoms are limited and constrained: I want to do it my way, I want to decide for myself. Then go ahead, be my pretty guest.

What happens next, in that aspired-for moment of freedom, may be absurd and impossibly amusing. Unable to decide for himself, or unable to blame anyone else in case he makes a mistake, he suddenly feels the shudder of freedom and the burden of choice. He fumbles and stutters as he finally chooses what he says he had always wanted but never got around to it because of other people's whips and canes. But at that moment of release, a scene he had endlessly played in his waking dreams, his decision, whether it be this woman or that career, this life or that death, remarkably ends up as an arbitrary judgment. You, you were longing for freedom and you blew it.

But because people are watching, and the last thing he wants to hear is I told you so, he bluffs his way to a happiness that while rotten and fake will nevertheless stand and endure: he will keep the reasons secret, maintain his posture and extol until his death his hard-won freedom--all the while muttering to himself how he did not know freedom and happiness were mutually exclusive, hiding his longing for the whip and the guard because at least they gave him some sense of meaning and direction. Even a lack of meaning or direction is in itself a meaning, a direction.

I understand why some prisoners commit higher crimes when their sentences are about to end, while others, still, find it easier to kill themselves and dispense with all that ceremony.


Popular posts from this blog

The Fields of Amorsolo

The first National Artist in Philippine history, referred to warmly as the “Grand Old Man of Philippine Art,” Fernando Amorsolo (1892–1972) still stands today as a looming figure in Philippine art responsible for being one of the artists who helped define what we up to now visually imagine as essentially Filipino. The images of rural life, of golden fields below clear blue, blue skies; the smiles of farmers which diminish their weariness as they plant, harvest, and winnow rice;most especially the iconic figure of the Filipina maiden working in the fields—the beloved dalagang bukid--; these, I believe, even after generations of Filipino painters since Amorsolo, have remained in our hearts and memory. Amorsolo did what great masters do for their country: bestow upon it its own icons, represent its native beauty, that is, to give its people and lands an identity and a face. There are, however, as many intentions for art as there are works of art. And these intentions will always remain in…

[Payapang Daigdig]

Written by Pat Nogoy, S.J.

Payapang Daigdig Felipe de Leon, Sr. 
Ang gabi'y payapa Lahat ay tahimik  Pati mga tala      Sa bughaw na langit 

Kay hinhin ng hangin Waring umiibig          Sa kapayapaan          Ng buong daigdig     
Payapang panahon    Ay diwa ng buhay Biyaya ng Diyos       Sa sangkatauhan
Ang gabi'y payapa Lahat ay tahimik Pati mga tala Sa bughaw na langit  
Pati mga tala           Sa bughaw na langit

The gift delivers Being/being Jean Luc Marion

There is something about the night.
The blanket of darkness hovering the other half of the day sparks ambivalence. Everything is the same in darkness—fear, joy, pain, triumph, doubt, glory, sorrow. Identities recede unto the vast anonymity. There is a pervading anxiety where existence slips into nothingness. One is never certain what to make out of darkness; maybe that is why the night shakes us because we never know. One cannot avoid imagining a something that is greater, higher, mightier, (even sinister) that lurks (hence the power of ghos…

Without Why (The Rose) II

Lifetime is a child at play; moving pieces in a game.
Kingship belongs to the child.

Heraclitus, Fragment 52

The child at play never asks itself why it plays. The child just plays; and if it could, it will play as long as possible, it will play throughout its life. See its delight and witness its smile.

If it would never go hungry or if the sun would never set it too will never leave its playmates and playthings. Time flies at play because it stops or suspends time. Time -- as we grownups only know too well -- is the culprit for order, schedules and priorities; yet for the child, there is no time, there is only bottomless play. It is we who impose that this or that should be done at this or that time. We stop the absurd and supposedly endless play ("He does nothing but play") because we insist that discipline, order and priorities be instilled in the child at an early age ("He needs to learn other things beside playing"). So that the child will become like us one da…