Skip to main content

"Sad Writing"

There are two kinds of sadness, and they are distinguished from each other by their objects or causes. The more usual kind is a sadness due to a particular event. The book I am reading may move me to tears, as the death of a friend can crush my heart for days on end. Our emotions are usually triggered by a stimulus--elation, anxiety, melancholy, fear. We feel such and such because . . . . But the more problematic instance is when you are sad, lonely, afraid, and silent without anything happening to you, without knowing any cause, without knowing why.

This is why I write when I am saddened without a definite reason. It is easy for me to say that I write when I feel such dark emotions so that I can, through writing, grope in the dark, reaching for something tangible to hold on to, a reason. Writing is searching for me. I rarely know what I am writing about till I write, I never know what I will find. So I write to find out, to strike the cords of the soul, tune it out to know which string is loose, even broken. This kind of writing is what people always call "cathartic" writing: you purge and purify yourself by bathing in words.

But, really, I usually finish writing without really finding anything. It's because writing is not just for cleaning yourself. It is, I feel, just a pure act. You let your mind go, your fingers work, you concentrate, you listen to yourself and welcome thoughts as they come, and then you speak. No joke, these things, it requires a profound effort each time. While writing is second nature already for some, they will still admit that words do not just flow out of their pen. Writing is work, even the plainest kind (but still with decency). And this is why I run to writing when I am in the dark and when I feel alone. It gives me something to do, it requires from me something that I can no longer give to a world which I sometimes do not understand, makes me feel important at least to myself, or at least to the moment which gave me the gift of doing something I still enjoy.

What you write, how your write, and the beauty of the words do not matter in "sad writing." What matters above all is honesty. When you are happy, thoughtful, doing a paper, or trying to impress someone--when you are writing for a reason other than writing--then you can never be really honest, never be really transparent. But writing in the dark, there you can weep and shout and complain and ask for help. Sincerity springs from the wells of sadness. No more masks, no more pretensions, no more nervous smiles, when you are in despair. Whatever for? The last thing you want to be when you are down is to appear intelligent and sound eloquent. The most gruesome sound on earth you will ever hear, they say, is a man wailing in terror and tears.

Nothing could be more naked than words.  


  1. Wow.......just saw that someone is feeling the same kind of sadness as i do......i am writing too, when i am sad without any particular reason...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fields of Amorsolo

The first National Artist in Philippine history, referred to warmly as the “Grand Old Man of Philippine Art,” Fernando Amorsolo (1892–1972) still stands today as a looming figure in Philippine art responsible for being one of the artists who helped define what we up to now visually imagine as essentially Filipino. The images of rural life, of golden fields below clear blue, blue skies; the smiles of farmers which diminish their weariness as they plant, harvest, and winnow rice;most especially the iconic figure of the Filipina maiden working in the fields—the beloved dalagang bukid--; these, I believe, even after generations of Filipino painters since Amorsolo, have remained in our hearts and memory. Amorsolo did what great masters do for their country: bestow upon it its own icons, represent its native beauty, that is, to give its people and lands an identity and a face. There are, however, as many intentions for art as there are works of art. And these intentions will always remain in…

Without Why (The Rose) II

Lifetime is a child at play; moving pieces in a game.
Kingship belongs to the child.

Heraclitus, Fragment 52

The child at play never asks itself why it plays. The child just plays; and if it could, it will play as long as possible, it will play throughout its life. See its delight and witness its smile.

If it would never go hungry or if the sun would never set it too will never leave its playmates and playthings. Time flies at play because it stops or suspends time. Time -- as we grownups only know too well -- is the culprit for order, schedules and priorities; yet for the child, there is no time, there is only bottomless play. It is we who impose that this or that should be done at this or that time. We stop the absurd and supposedly endless play ("He does nothing but play") because we insist that discipline, order and priorities be instilled in the child at an early age ("He needs to learn other things beside playing"). So that the child will become like us one da…

A Love Sooner than Later

BROWN PENNY William Butler YeatsI whispered, 'I am too young,' And then, 'I am old enough'; Wherefore I threw a penny To find out if I might love. 'Go and love, go and love, young man, If the lady be young and fair.' Ah, penny, brown penny, brown penny, I am looped in the loops of her hair. O love is the crooked thing, There is nobody wise enough To find out all that is in it, For he would be thinking of love Till the stars had run away And the shadows eaten the moon. Ah, penny, brown penny, brown penny, One cannot begin it too soon.

One cannot begin to love too soon--conversely, one should not love too late or in life's demise. That waiting for the "right time," or the "right person" to love, what are these but the cries or sighs of an unready, even tired, heart? One becomes ready only when one begins to understand love slowly (or again), and one understands love progressively when one, simply, performs the act of love. Love, like mos…